Issuer Gateway Knowledge Hub

null

S.3.1.17 Asset Integrity Management

 

Last Updated September 2024
null

Definition

 

This indicator is designed to assesses how well a company is managing its assets and is consistent with ISO 55001 (any asset type) and PAS 55 (physical assets) requirements. If a company is certified to ISO 55001 or PAS 55 this is best practice.




 

null

What are Programmes and Management Systems Indicators 

Programmes and Management Systems indicators evaluate a company’s operational systems for managing its material ESG issues. These indicators are aligned with and reflective of recognized management systems, such as the ISO 9001 quality standard or the ISO 14001 environmental management standard. Their assessment is based on the following criteria:


  • Managerial responsibility
  • Risk/impact assessment
  • Training or other initiatives to ensure compliance with policies
  • Objectives or targets
  • Monitoring and measurement
  • Incident investigation and corrective action


    Assessment Criteria

     

    • Formal asset management policy

      A formal policy commitment to an asset management system.

    • Formal asset management plan established.

      Evidence of an Asset Management plan.

    • Managerial responsibility

      Manager is accountable to the CEO or COO or the Board of Directors.

    • Awareness and training

      Awareness and training for relevant employees and/or contractors about the asset management policy and the asset management systems.

    • Preventative and corrective actions

      Systems in place to identify potential failures in asset performance and perform preventive actions, and examples of corrective action to control and correct any incidents. Examples include actions to improve service reliability and safety; including but not limited to replacing aging lines, infrastructure hardening, smart grid technologies, climate change resilience and cybersecurity resilience.

    • Continual improvement

      Evidence of continually improving the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of its asset management system. Examples include, but not limited to, changing or enhancing systems to prepare for changing climate-change related events or changing demand/consumption patterns; or new asset management technologies and practices, such as development of reliability and predictive technologies during the procurement of new assets or the design of modified assets.

    • Risk identification and mitigation disclosure 

      Risk identification/mitigation disclosure should cover specific risks to assets including but not limited to capacity shortage, aging assets, service reliability, probability of asset failure, asset integrity/safety, efficiency, and climate change resilience strategies.

    • Disclosure of specific asset management objectives and targets
      Clear and measurable quantitative objectives and targets, including but not limited to asset failure targets, customer satisfaction, improving availability and reliability of the system and asset integrity and compliance targets such as meeting the requirements for safety, health and environment.
    • Monitoring and measuring performance
      Reporting on asset performance metrics, including but not limited to quality, operational performance, operational data, reliability, quality, safety, customer satisfaction indicators.
    • Regular internal or external audits
      Evidence of internal and/or external audits within the last 3 years.
    • The company has a certified asset management programme that is applied to less than 50% of its operations.

     

     

    Scoring

    100

    The company has a very strong programme.

    75

    The company has a strong policy.

    50

    The company has an adequate policy. 

    40

    The company has a certified programme but its scope is limited.

    25

    The company has a weak programme.

    0

    Based on available evidence, the company does not have a programme.