Black swans are unexpected events characterized by their extreme rarity, severe impact, and widespread insistence that they were obvious in hindsight.
The sudden changes caused by global crisis force companies to adapt and change how they do everyday business. With digitization becoming increasingly embedded in more aspects of companies’ operations, cybersecurity software is an essential infrastructure that needs to be developed alongside new processes. Essentially, it is complementary product to the activity of new and existing operations.
Recent and still persistent global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or the Russian-Ukrainian war, can be seen as a catalyst for companies willing to restructure their everyday business processes.
The COVID-19 pandemic quickly created a demand for a new flexible way to work remotely, along with a higher demand for delivery services. As a result, the spending on identity management services and e-commerce platforms increased—according to the World Economic Forum—leading to an increased requirement for companies to monitor added access points for hackers as the IT landscape effectively expanded.
When looking at cybersecurity thematic funds, we found evidence of the increased need for monitoring cyberthreats. Based on this preliminary analysis, we created a cybersecurity model fund by combining four of the oldest cybersecurity thematic funds and comparing the performance against an IT benchmark. Then, we compared the performance during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, expecting a boosted demand for cybersecurity products to directly benefit cybersecurity companies' stock prices.
Within the first 15 days of the Russian-Ukrainian war—24 February to 11 March 2022—the cybersecurity fund increased by 5.1%, whereas the benchmark Technology exchanged-traded fund declined by -5.8%, a difference of 10.9%, as Exhibit 1 shows.
Exhibit 1: Price Action of Cybersecurity Funds - Russia-Ukrainian War Effect
Model Cybersecurity Fund consists of an equal weight investment in the Beta Shares Global Cybersecurity ETF, ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF, First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, and the L&G Cyber Security ETF.
Source: Morningstar Sustainalytics
From 8 February to 8 September 2022, our cybersecurity model fund is down only -13.9%, ahead of the sector benchmark, which is down -17.0%. This is a current outperformance of 3.1% against a benchmark that has consistently outperformed our cybersecurity model fund over the past five years. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, cyberwarfare is perceived as an imminent risk for the first time: A thought-provoking finding.
The Russian invasion scaled cyberthreats upward, pushing for increased security of vital infrastructure while underpinning the IT landscape expansion initiated by COVID-19.
Ultimately, some systemic events have the potential to compound on one another and exponentially increase environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk and financial cost.
More and more, cyberthreats are perceived as a systemic ESG risk, as illustrated by both global systemic events, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. As such, it is timely for companies to consider incorporating ESG countermeasures to mitigate the potential financial losses of cyberattacks.
Recent Content
DEI Rollbacks: Impact on ESG Risk Ratings and Broader Implications for Investors
This article covers how not all reported rollbacks in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives will have the same impact. Due to the relatively low weight of DEI in Sustainalytics’ ESG Risk Rating, we do not anticipate significant changes to overall ratings.
Industrial-Scale Decarbonization in the EU: Stewardship Field Notes From Germany, France and Spain
This article covers how Morningstar Sustainalytics’ Stewardship Team embarked on a field trip in November 2024 to learn how EU industry leaders are navigating the complex challenges of the energy transition.
